Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full results for the Australian federal election, 1998

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) RuleTheWiki (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full results for the Australian federal election, 1998

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do we really need a separate page for this? The tally results are perfectly explained on the Australian federal election, 1998 page and this page is mainly just full of stats for all minor parties with Wikipedia:Notability being called into question, along with that, there are no same pages for other federal elections. --RuleTheWiki (talk) 17:12, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Contrary to the nominator's assertion, while 2001 merges in the full results, every subsequent election (2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016) has had at least two results subpages, one for House of Reps and one for Senate. A Merge would be arguable in this case, but would make Australian federal election, 1998 less clear, and an eventual re-split would be likely. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 02:33, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:42, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reconstitute, split and rename in line with federal results pages as outlined by Hydronium Hydroxide above. Frickeg (talk) 06:23, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:43, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:47, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adopt Frickeg's suggestion ("Reconstitute, split and rename in line with federal results pages as outlined by Hydronium Hydroxide above.") Quis separabit? 14:51, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.