Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fulcrum Digital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fulcrum Digital

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fully promotional article written by a PR person. Fails WP:GNG/WP:NCORP. Hatchens (talk) 06:36, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 06:36, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A quasi-website article created and tended by a succession of WP:SPAs, setting out the company's wares in blitzes of buzzword bingo, uncited biographies of its executives, etc. Discounting fastest-grown and best-places to work listings and routine announcements, all of which fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH, searches are finding more announcement coverage about site openings, but not the level of coverage needed to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 07:04, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I looked through Google Search and Google News and didn't find anything that would qualify as WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Totally agree with the lack of notability. Ita also a great example of add copy. Where a bunch of meaningless buzzwords are used to make a topic seem notable and interesting when it totally isn't. Adamant1 (talk) 06:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The creator of this article did not make any useful efforts at establishing the notability of the organization. Looked through the sources but nothing reliable was found. Checked Google but nothing meaningful about the organization was found except some few press releases. Ugbedeg (talk) 10:44,25 June 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.