Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fujio Shido

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep following improvement of the article. RL0919 (talk) 17:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fujio Shido[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD originally tagged by Johnpacklambert. Reasoning was: The one reference here is not enough to show notability and chefs are not default notable just because someone somewhere once published a short blurd on them. Reasoning still holds. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the one source is a passing mention that says this chef studied at a school in Paris, the school in question is also the publisher of the one reference. This is not an indepdent source, so does not add towards passing GNG. Beyond this GNG can never be passed by one source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Johnpacklambert: Pinging you to see if you want to reconsider your opinion now that the article has been redone. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've completely redone the article, adding several new and solid sources. It definitely passes GNG now. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I should note that I'm surprised I could find so many references on him given that he died before the internet was really a thing (about 6 years before it became a real thing with content outside of academia, science, and military stuff). And Japan lags about a decade behind North America in what you can find online, too, so many of the contemporary sources are only available in print. Given what I could find, I'm 100% sure there are many print sources I can't access online. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article is in much better condition, and the sources seem to indicate notability. Why? I Ask (talk) 18:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - and suggest withdrawing the nomination, the article as it stands now gives a clear indication of notability. nableezy - 00:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Nihonjoe's research. Star Mississippi 02:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, now has significant sources.Fulmard (talk) 19:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.