Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fucking (disambiguation)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was fucking delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fucking (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This disambiguation has only 2 entries, and they already are in fuck (disambiguation) , I say Delete and Redirect to fuck (disambiguation), and no, I'm not gonna speedy remove tag it, or redirect it myself. Because I need opinion from other Wikipedians first. TheBlazikenMaster 10:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not used, no loss. Pavel Vozenilek 11:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No one's going to type "Fucking (disambiguation)" in the search box. Maxamegalon2000 12:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually I did it sometimes. Well, some people do in fact search for it. But it's too rare search term, but why the hell can't it be a redirect? TheBlazikenMaster 12:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No inbound links, not a very plausible search term, so no need to change it to a redirect - just get rid of it. Arkyan • (talk) 15:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Not that I object to deletion, but a disambiguation page shouldn't have any inbound links anyway, right?Chunky Rice 18:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- They shouldn't, my point was as there are none it will not create any redlinks by deleting it rather than redirecing. Arkyan • (talk) 19:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah. Okay, I get it. Thanks.Chunky Rice 19:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above deletes. Acalamari 17:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. GoodnightmushTalk 20:01, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Baristarim 04:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.