Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frumgar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge/redirect to Éothéod. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular ^T · C 01:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Frumgar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another Lord of the Rings article that is nothing more then genealogy. Ridernyc (talk) 23:53, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Send him back to where he came frum. The only way you're likely to have heard the name is by reading whichever appendix he's listed in, in which case you already know all that's available. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect/Merge to Éothéod 70.29.210.242 (talk) 04:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Éothéod. I don't see why deletion is necessary when a redirect will do as fine. Éothéod itself can be merged into Rohan, but that's another issue. Uthanc (talk) 06:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's non-notable, unreferenced and not likely to ever be a search term. Ridernyc (talk) 10:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's likely to be a search term because it's Tolkien. Some will inevitably treat Wikipedia like a Tolkien encyclopedia site. I'm not saying we should keep every single scrap of info but there's a place for everything no matter how small. Uthanc (talk) 12:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

redirect Every named tolkien character should be included, at least as a redirect, even for the backstory. . There's no possible reason why a redirect would be harmful. it will help some people: yhere is no name in Tokien that people may not look for. . Redirect are an easy compromise in situations like this. DGG ( talk ) 14:34, 16 March 2010 (UTC) .[reply]
Don't you dare delete my father!. Seriously though, a redirect is the best solution for this and other truly minor characters. Fram (talk) 14:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.