Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fruition of the Spirit-Beyond
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted by Jimfbleak: G11 - advertising (non-admin technical closure). Ymblanter (talk) 09:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fruition of the Spirit-Beyond[edit]
- Fruition of the Spirit-Beyond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is possibly about a book and/or some art? It is basically some quotes from the bible and some sentences I can't parse. It claims that "All work is copywritten 200012 JGP", and has no references. heather walls (talk) 05:11, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:53, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A search showed absolutely zero coverage for this book. In fact, the only site that actually mentions this specific book is Wikipedia. There's no notability and both the original editor's page and the wiki entry appear to be an attempt to promote the book, especially considering that the user attempted to add a facebook page to Visual arts. (I checked the fb page, which does not seem to exist.) Closing admins should be aware that almost the exact same material is on the original editor's user page and that the content on said user page is all pretty promotional. I've left a warning on her talk page.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:01, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm going to try to speedy this, as it's painfully clear that this is not notable in the slightest.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:10, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.