Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Froter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily redirected to Frotteurism -- Flyguy649 ^talk 17:59, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Froter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally WP:PROD 16th March (See TalkPage for full reasoning. Contested same date on basis writer awaiting material from release of source publication, giving approx. 7 days required. Can still find no notability of the term, or reference to the suggested work by Dr. Thomas Gutheil

Delete or redirect. This is just a misspelling of "frotteur" (see Frotteurism) from someone without a perfect command of the English language. Probably this falls under CSD A10, although maybe leaving a redirect would be a better idea, since I guess this is a plausible misspelling. In any event, it's not a hoax. Glenfarclas (talk) 03:07, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.