Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frontlines (Roblox)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Roblox games. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frontlines (Roblox)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BEFORE shows no more usable source, only this [1] . Thus, failing WP:N. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 14:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Roblox games The sources are largely just news articles saying "hey this exists", but WP:SIGCOV requires the sources to be able to fully encompass the game, which is difficult without previews/reviews. There's already a page for these sorts of Roblox-created games, most of which don't merit an article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:06, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Roblox games; As the page creator I'll self admit that I was unable to stretch the sources used as much as I expected. I still believe this can be a standalone subject, but I'll let time decide that on if the game gets more coverage during the Roblox Innovation Awards.

NegativeMP1 16:13, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Zxcvbnm.—Mythdon (talk • contribs) 13:39, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or Delete per nom. This article has no signs of notablity at all. Fails WP:GNG. Summerslam2022 (talk) 18:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh come on. I understand and agree with there being a merger/redirect since the subject is covered elsewhere, but there's still notability to the subject, with several articles that discussed it majorly in some form. The article shouldn't be completely deleted. NegativeMP1 19:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you oppose the proposed redirect target? Sergecross73 msg me 14:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.