Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Front News - Georgia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Front News - Georgia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability, and no references. BEFORE shows no coverage. Article in ka-wiki also newly created, has same problems. HouseOfChange (talk) 23:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Companies, and Georgia (country). CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, @HouseOfChange:. This article is translated from Georgian Wikipedia where external links are enough to provide sufficient information about this news agency. The news agency is well known in Georgia and have no problems in ka-wiki. Yours faithfully,--იაკობ მახარაძე (talk) 23:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To satisfy WP:GNG you need "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Those sources do not need to be in English. So if you can find such sources in the Georgian language, Google translate will help us read them and then this article will be suitable to be kept. And if you find such coverage, I will withdraw this AfD--but we need such sources. Thanks for your efforts and for your civility. HouseOfChange (talk) 23:50, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, it is independent coverage that is necessary. I don't see any at a quick glance. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 18:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I was unable to identify any significant coverage in independent reliable sources that would suffice under WP:NWEB/the GNG. I considered !voting for a redirect to Raul Kiria as an alternative to deletion, but that article is poised to be deleted as well; in any event this title is an unlikely search term. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.