Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Above (group)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 16:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From Above (group)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. scope_creep^Talk 23:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- lomrjyo^{(✉ • 📝)} 23:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep clearly passes WP:NBAND.Gravehoot (talk) 08:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC) Striking blocked sock. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:16, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This person is a SPA who came in this morning. scope_creep^Talk 08:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A classic case of WP:INHERIT. There is scant coverage and almost all of it is based on their association with Matthew Knowles. JSFarman (talk) 17:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.