Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friedrich Alfred Kahnert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:23, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Friedrich Alfred Kahnert

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kahnert was an economist, and published a few works. I was not able to find actual reviews, and the passing mentions just do not seem to be enough to pass academic notability 1. He clearly does not pass standard notability by GNG, and he is no where near any other acdemic notability. This was an unsourced article from 2009 until earlier today. Other than adding references to Kahnert to pages connected to deaths in 2002, creating this article was the only edit done by the article creator. I see no claim to notability in the article, and do not think the passing mentions to works he was an author, editor or co-author on are enough to show notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:15, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 16:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 16:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 16:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 16:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've found it really hard to find anything substantial about this person. His most important book (Economic integration among developing countries) has around 100 citations on Google Scholar, which does not bode well for his notability under WP:PROF. I also agree that WP:GNG looks to be out of reach. Modussiccandi (talk) 21:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, while it is strange that nothing can be found for an OECD vice president, there is no real claim to notability or RS here. --hroest 21:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.