Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freewill (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Freewill (song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG as a non-notable song. I am not saying it can't be a list entry on List of songs recorded by Rush but I cannot justifiably say it should have its own article. Dysklyver 18:58, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:33, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There appear to be numerous sources about this song. Mind matrix 14:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Easily passes GNG with critical analysis in this book, this book, and this book (and coverage in several others, this is just a sample off the first page of a Google Books search). And it has a standalone Allmusic article here. And it has a little bit about its guitar solo here. I'm sure with some effort one could find more, but this is more than enough to demonstrate notability. Rlendog (talk) 15:58, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.