Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeview (UK) UHF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 03:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Freeview (UK) UHF

The article is no use to Wikipedia as it will list UHF channels which vary with each different transmitter. Also Digital terrestrial television in the United Kingdom covers the Multiplex system AxG 18:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - D'oh! I wanted to nominate this article! Violates WP:NOT#DIR and WP:NOR, indeed, reading through it all, the list doesn't make no sense to me whatsoever. No references to anything written in the article, so also violates WP:V. As per AxG, the article is redundant to Digital terrestrial television in the United Kingdom, which also covers Top Up TV. --tgheretford (talk) 19:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's wildly inaccurate and other articles cover the same ground much better. --Harumphy 20:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nomination Pit-yacker 21:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Lankiveil 02:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Delete/merge If there is anything worth keeping that is not repeated elsewhere, merge it and lose the rest. Adrian M. H. 16:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pointless overly technical article. Anything encyclopedic that anyone might actually wish to know would be found in Digital terrestrial television in the United Kingdom or Freeview. A1octopus 12:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.