Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeman Is A Problem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:50, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Freeman Is A Problem[edit]

Non-notable vanity spam for a bootleg album which hasn't been released yet, and which nets zero Google hits. chocolateboy 13:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly vanity spam. The article itself claims the album will never actually be released commercially, but aims to be an "underground internet-only cult favourite" - well resubmit it when it is, otherwise non-notable crystal-ballism. Comment: There is a DJ Joey C in the US who brings up numerous Google hits, but this one seems to be British. --Canley 13:51, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of UK-related deletions. -- Canley 13:55, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it is "due to be released online on Monday, 23 January 2006." which is tomorrow. What if it tanks? Ruby 14:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails the notability test. Latinus 18:22, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment wouldnt it have been better to nomitate after the 'release date'? At least then we'd be able to see if it was likely to be notable or not. Not that I personally put a lot of store by 'notable', so long as its verifiable. Jcuk 18:45, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unverifiable - personal websites dont verify content -- Astrokey44|talk 19:36, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The artistes/author should wait until the album has been released and charted/achieved notable status before creating a page. Fails WP:Music notability criteria - album places in chart. (aeropagitica) 20:02, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nnband. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-23 19:28Z

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.