Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freemales, SPUDs and Salary Miners
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 09:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Freemales, SPUDs and Salary Miners[edit]
- Freemales, SPUDs and Salary Miners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A clutch of three neologisms. Article is guerrilla advertising for Pacific Micromarketing. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 11:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and these terms are not in any widespread use - yet. If it later becomes clear that they are widespread, then there might be an argument for their inclusion, but most likely as three distinct pages.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 11:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologisms. Possible speedy as spam. DarkAudit (talk) 12:43, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Neologisms that fail WP:N and are un-encyclopedic. --Pmedema (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all the above, couldn't this one be speedied? --Camaeron (t/c) 21:43, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as WP:SNOWBALL. This is a series of neologisms that appeared in a syndicated opinion piece in Australia's media. -- Mark Chovain 23:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.