Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeda Hanni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:07, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Freeda Hanni

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) (in Chinese)^[1]

^ http://www.baidu.com/s?ie=utf-8&f=8&rsv_bp=1&rsv_idx=1&tn=baidu&wd=%E9%9D%9E%E8%BE%BE%20%E9%A6%96%E9%83%BD%E5%BD%A2%E8%B1%A1%E5%B0%8F%E5%A7%90&rsv_pq=c6d6ea660002261e&rsv_t=b1f1%2FIkUQoqfj%2FZHtwI6Aa4OEMr2jgp4oVi%2FxGuWi3bcQ0krQDtYQR966oc&rsv_enter=1&inputT=25537&rsv_sug3=45&rsv_sug1=9&rsv_sug2=0&rsv_sug4=26385&bs=china%20media%20capital

Does not appear to pass GNG. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage found in reliable sources. Fails WP:BIO. Philg88 ^♦talk 04:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This actress fails WP:GNG by a mile. Eat me, I'm a red bean (take a huge bite) 11:53, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - My first searches instantly found nothing and it seems there isn't even an IMDb page for her. SwisterTwister talk 18:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The article has provided many RS (in Chinese). STSC (talk) 04:42, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Baidu isn't a reliable source and neither are social media sites/BBS'. Philg88 ^♦talk 06:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeda_Hanni#References STSC (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — User:STSC, the so-called reference(s) are clearly written by the same people/person who wrote this page, i.e. the girl's management team / family / herself. She's obviously talented, pretty, and young, so there's a possibility that she may be big one day, but for the time being, she doesn't fail WP:GNG by a mile — she fails it by a lightyear. Timmyshin (talk) 04:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] ttp://www.baidu.com/s?ie=utf-8&f=8&rsv_bp=1&rsv_idx=1&tn=baidu&wd=%E9%9D%9E%E8%BE%BE%20%E9%A6%96%E9%83%BD%E5%BD%A2%E8%B1%A1%E5%B0%8F%E5%A7%90&rsv_pq=c6d6ea660002261e&rsv_t=b1f1%2FIkUQoqfj%2FZHtwI6Aa4OEMr2jgp4oVi%2FxGuWi3bcQ0krQDtYQR966oc&rsv_enter=1&inputT=25537&rsv_sug3=45&rsv_sug1=9&rsv_sug2=0&rsv_sug4=26385&bs=china%20media%20capital

[1]