Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free market fascism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted by Jimfbleak: A7 - no significance. (non-admin technical closure)Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Free market fascism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources demonstrating notability - only source is the author's forum. I've searched, and most of the sources I can find are also blogs and forums. I can't find, for example, any academic sources - at least, not ones that support the specific ideas presented by this article. There are some scholar and book hits for the term, but they don't look to be supportive of this article's specific contents - which look like the author's own ideas to me. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "No reliable sources demonstrating notability"
- That's because it is completely new idea. Freemarketfascist (talk) 16:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, then it doesn't get a Wikipedia article, because this is an encyclopedia and not a forum for publishing original ideas - see WP:OR, and WP:RS. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:19, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an unsourced original essay about a neologism. Carrite (talk) 19:11, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Essay with no reliable sources to indicate notability. AllyD (talk) 20:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - basically, at best, synthesis of new sources. This could be subject to re-creation later, but it is still too soon to judge. This project is not a place to publish new ideas, but blogs are. Bearian (talk) 22:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. 23:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 23:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. 23:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unencyclopedic essay. Clearly fails WP:GNG and runs afoul of WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, & WP:V.--JayJasper (talk) 06:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.