Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Lives

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Free Lives[edit]

Free Lives (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not my field, but they have apparently produced only one notable game , Broforce. That's not enough to make the company notable , DGG ( talk ) 20:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 03:04, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 03:04, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 03:04, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, whilst Broforce is a notable game, (And it's pretty good from recolection), it doesn't make the company notable. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per WP:NOTINHERITED.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:00, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. It has potential for future recreation, but its time as central article topic has not yet come.    Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 23:45, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 21:46, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • KeepGenital Jousting is also a game I had heard of (never knew it was by the same developer as Broforce, though).[1][2][3][4] Gorn has apparently also been in the news.[5][6][7]. There should be plenty of sources and the studio certainly meets WP:GNG. I think Genital Jousting and Gorn may meet the general notability guidelines as well, though I'd recommend making a draft for those first. Right now, this article can cover them, as it is still short. ~Mable (chat) 08:10, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: sources offered above do not meet WP:NCORP. Just a directory listing for a company going about its business. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:21, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.