Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free From Conceptual Thoughts (LOUD Studio Album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:26, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Free From Conceptual Thoughts (LOUD Studio Album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article that fails to make any claim of notability, and a search does not reveal much. Reads like a copyvio, incidentally. TheLongTone (talk) 13:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:15, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under WP:G12 due to the unambiguous copyright violation in the article's history. The only non-infringing content is the track list, and the earliest history contains the copyvio. I've been combing through the user's contributions speedying many other copyvios. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 17:10, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unsourced article, copyvio in all versions, sources could not readily have been found.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Indeed, I savagely edited the article on the band which was full of what smelt like copyvio and was certainlt apallingly writte fanguff.TheLongTone (talk) 12:32, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.