Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Parker-Rhodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Parker-Rhodes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Concerns over neutrality, notability. The phrasing of some parts of the article, such as "He married author and political activist Damaris Parker-Rhodes and the couple earned a reputation as "bohemians" and eccentrics.[3] They were both members of the Communist Party (Klaus Fuchs stayed with them in Cambridge),[3] but became disillusioned with communism and in 1948 joined the Society of Friends." and "Parker-Rhodes was an accomplished linguist and mastered at least 23 languages, claiming that they became "easier after the first half-dozen"." seem hoax-ish. The reference placed after the latter quote didn't indicate anything about 23 languages, either. Perhaps I skimmed (the reference) too quickly. Levinge (talk) 01:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep—Reference #3 is a blog, not a RS, and the statements sourced to that should be removed. Other than than, this fellow most certainly meets the criteria for reliability; anyone listed in Gregory Ainsworth's (a noted mycological historian), Brief Biographies of British Mycologists automatically qualifies for Wikipedia notability, I would think. Regarding the languages, the cited source says: "A point worth drawing out here in passing is that AFPR ["Arthur Frederick Parker-Rhodes"], unlike most contemporary linguists, really did know languages, at least as regards reading them. He learned them as a hobby and would sometimes admit to twenty three: he said they became easier after the first half-dozen because you probably had a hook to hang a new one on." Sasata (talk) 02:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 09:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Obituary in the Times suffices. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. Certainly appears to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 20:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. More material to be added on Frederick Parker-Rhodes' wife Damaris,from her autobiographical book The way out is the way in (1985). Vernon White ^{. . . Talk} 09:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Appears to be notable.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:27, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Plenty of impeccable references, plus his publications, establish notability. --NSH001 (talk) 12:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.