Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Charles Fripp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 09:19, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Charles Fripp[edit]

Frederick Charles Fripp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't seem to be notable per WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. Current sources are social media or the publications he has written for. I can't find any reliable sources with significant discussion of him. Aranya (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Aranya (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Aranya (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Aranya (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Aranya (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Aranya (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Aranya (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I was not able to find anything through Google, nor in a newspaper search to substantiate this person's notability. Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE nor WP:BASIC. Netherzone (talk) 06:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 06:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.