Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Archer (photographer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Frederick Scott Archer. — Aitias // discussion 23:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Archer (photographer)

Most of the article deals with the "zone system" which already has a substantial article of it's own. Subject seems to have no notability beyond that system. CarbonX (talk) 14:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Frederick Scott Archer. This article isn't about the person, and the hatnote at the destination points to the Fred Arthur dab page, where the sentence that is about the 20th century person can be merged with a link to the zone system. Thryduulf (talk) 23:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Archer (this one) was a notable Hollywood portrait photographer, and was instrumental in the development and use of still photopgraphy in Hollywood, and in it's use in advancing the film careers of various actors. The zone theory was not his most important contribution. His photos are now very rare, and very expensive. Michael Dawson covers him in LA's Early Moderns, and there is a small collection of his photos at the Goldwyn Hollywood Public Library. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dstrehl (talk • contribs) 18:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per suggestion above and nom. Notable adpects of subject already covered in another article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.