Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frazerton Ltd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Angr/talk 12:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frazerton Ltd

Delete small family business, article written by family member who makes unsubstantiated pov claims about minimum wages and world economy--Porturology 03:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Pure vanity. Royboy crashfan 04:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vanity. PJM 04:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vanity, non-notable, only has 12 employees. Mak emi 04:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per above.--Vercalos 05:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. In AfD, Rush's statement "everybody has to deviate from the 'nom'" doesn't apply :) Deckiller 05:29, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable small business. dbtfz ^talk 08:58, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, business which lasted 70 years and had up to 100 employees. Kappa 10:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Kappa. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 15:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn company, vanity. --Ter e nc e Ong 15:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. Eivind 20:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, sadly, and the same will quite possibly happen to the firm itself despite the author's best efforts. I really wanted to call keep here, but I can't find anything out there about them other than directory entries. The comment about the decline of British textile manufacturing is true, but generic, and in the end I couldn't turn up anything from a reliable source to substantiate the article or to indicate historical signifcance, and it very clearly fails WP:CORP on current size and turnover. Just zis Guy you know? 21:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn -- Alpha269 16:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.