Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frankie Martinez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Frankie Martinez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While it cites some pages with this dance instructor's certainly enjoyable time teaching, he is not notable and the page's content and style point to an obvious resume that exists solely to boost his credentials. Noopinonada (talk) 00:58, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no reliable sources discuss him that I am able to find. The current article is written like a personal website vs an encyclopedia article. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 02:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Definitely has some WP:WEASEL and WP:PEACOCK. The article has the term "well-known." That is also POV. The article as says he coined the term Afro- Latin Funk. That claim needs to be sourced because for all I know some random choreographer could have coined that term. The article in general needs sources. The article in general reads like a bio from a personal website. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 01:53, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.