Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank and Beans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by Martijn Hoekstra per CSD A7, G11. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 13:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Frank and Beans[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

small retailer; the references are unreliable uncritical PR blurbs in various websites. DGG ( talk ) 22:56, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 23:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 23:27, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The statement in the infobox that the retailer has 5 employees is pretty much a concession of non-notability. The concession is borne out by the absence, so far as I can tell, of significant coverage in reliable sources. --Mkativerata (talk) 02:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article doesn't even seem to make a claim of notability Nick-D (talk) 02:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nominated for speedy deletion on the basis of lacking significance and being unambiguously promotional. AlanS (talk) 10:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.