Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Pucelik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- John Reaves 23:01, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Pucelik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

plain promo The Banner talk 23:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promotion of pseudoscience Neuro-linguistic programming. Inadequate sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Selective merge to neuro-linguistic programming. Neuro-linguistic programming may be a pseudoscience but, like it or not, the amount of attention it has got in reliable sources over the past 40 years makes it a notable pseudoscience. That makes the claim in the article that its subject is one of the founders of NLP a definite assertion of notability which, as it is sourced to a volume co-edited by one of the generally-acknowledged founders of NLP, can be presumed verified. However, as that assertion is not elaborated in the article, it currently does no more than warrant a mention in neuro-linguistic programming, and needs that elaboration, reliably sourced from secondary sources, to establish notability for a stand-alone article. PWilkinson (talk) 12:23, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 16:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Considering your comments I improved the article: added information and sources. I think that now it is logically structured and the moment of how all that NLP thing started is now described and can be verified (John Grinder wrote about Frank Pucelik as the third developer of NLP in his Whispering in the wind, for example). If you have any suggestions on improving the quality of the article I’ll be grateful to see them. Alexandra Garagulya — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandra Garagulya (talk • contribs) 14:14, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- It is still plain promo. The Banner talk 11:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.