Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Conallin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Conallin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This "senior professional golf player's" only claim to fame seems to be that he has participated in, and not won, some senior opens. I don't see how this article is establishing his notability as a golf player, according to WP:ATH#Golf. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 21:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:27, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The article is in terrible shape and was most likely written by the man himself or one of his friends/family. That said, he does get a few mentions in The Age: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]; The Sydney Morning Herald: [6], [7]; Newcastle Herald: [8]. He appears to have played on the Australian PGA for many, was president of the Victorian PGA, and plays on the Australian, Asian and European senior tours. Unfortunately, none of these things confer notability per NSPORTS and none of the coverage is significant enough for GNG, so I'm leaning towards delete. Jenks24 (talk) 04:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.