Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Ancona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Ancona

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem notable outside of his death. His branch of the Klan has no separate article of its own. Rusted AutoParts 02:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This branch of the KKK should have a separate page. This page shows the the branch is an important KKK group.KU KLUX KAN'T. There is an argument for combining the Ancona page with a page for the Traditionalist American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan,, but this group should be covered. After Ancona's death, the group may change. Nereocystis (talk) 18:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article is on a person and there is no indication this person is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:58, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment move to "Murder/Death of Frank Ancona" the death is getting coverage in all the big national and international newspapers. The guy got predeath attention (Discovery Channel documentary), among others. Remember we have bad people on here too sometimes. Looks like the trial with the suspected murderer might drag on too. I see no end in possible sources soon. GuzzyG (talk) 13:05, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete no notability based on his position held. I think we should wait for a few months if an article on his death is warranted. LibStar (talk) 17:13, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.