Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Aloysius Tierney
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. This contributor has little or no controbutions outside of this, and has issued personal attacks. Bad faith nomination (non-admin closure) DustiSPEAK!! 23:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Frank Aloysius Tierney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The utter insignificance of the article subject is only matched by the wholly churlish and vapid prose in which this fetid abortion of an article is written. People are coming to Wikipedia to learn about worthy subjects, not to have their time wasted reading some article about a subject nobody cares about that seems as if it was written by a third-grader with a learning disability. Dickensfest (talk) 22:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article is well sourced and seems to have held notable positions. Dickensfest, I suggest you don't issue any personal attacks.--TM 22:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep as bad faith nomination. The article, while by no means complete, establishes that the subject meets WP:BIO. This edit summary tells me that this nomination amounts to WP:IDONTLIKEIT, and the nomination rationale tells me that the nominator has not read the article in question. At best it indicates the nominator did not go over WP:BEFORE. Note that the nominator nominated this and Aureliano Urrutia, which was created by the same editor, Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk · contribs), minutes apart. —KuyaBriBriTalk 23:00, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.