Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francoism (Gaming)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Francoism (Gaming) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested PROD. Neologism which lacks any verifiable, third-party sources establishing any notability. MuZemike (talk) 23:32, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 23:32, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As a Cybernations player, I can say for certain that it is notable...in CN. Certainly not notable enough in the real-world to merit an article. Paragon12321 23:53, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional Comment There is a huge war in CN going on right now. One of the (many) sides of it is Vox Populi (one of the alliances in the article) accusing the New Pacific Order (also mentioned) of being a completely tyrannical government. The fact that this article was created now leads me to believe that it is a propaganda piece, merely an other attempt to use Wikipedia for soapboxing. Paragon12321 04:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you prove that? I'm just asking because if so, this can be G10'd (page that disparages their subject). MuZemike (talk) 15:58, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional Comment There is a huge war in CN going on right now. One of the (many) sides of it is Vox Populi (one of the alliances in the article) accusing the New Pacific Order (also mentioned) of being a completely tyrannical government. The fact that this article was created now leads me to believe that it is a propaganda piece, merely an other attempt to use Wikipedia for soapboxing. Paragon12321 04:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I have found no reliable sources that suggest this term is established outside of NationStates, and CyberNations. As a result, I have concluded it is a neologism, and I believe that this article should be deleted as a result. JEdgarFreeman (talk) 23:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Completely irrelevant to, well, anything. Atheist Haircut (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:56, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete what the heck is this nonsense? JuJube (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I am all for this, as I prodded the article a few days ago. The creator contested the prod, and if you look at the article's talk page, seriously suggested that the Francoism redirect be turned into a disambiguation page Spain Under Franco to give this nonsense more billing (and, in point of fact, actually did so). Wikipedia is not for something made up in an online game one day. RGTraynor 11:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per others. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 17:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.