Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francoforte (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Francoforte

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same as the previous reasoning at the AfD less than a month ago which resulted in a "soft delete" decision. References fail to meet GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. Article was restored but not worked on, no improvements. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Organizations, Companies, and Australia. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Pinging previous participants Nythar and LibStar. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete at least 2 of the sources are local. I'm not sure if urbanlist is quasi-advertising. Fails WP:CORP. The article creator who is currently banned has a bad habit of recreating deleted articles, which shows a failure to accept consensus. LibStar (talk) 05:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NCORP.4meter4 (talk) 19:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.