Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis McInerney
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:39, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Francis McInerney[edit]
- Francis McInerney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wholly unreferenced BLP, for which I cannot find any reliable sourcing. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 02:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Come on people, don't be shy :). ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 18:11, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't meet WP:BIO in my opinion. Sourcing is limited to isolated mentions and material from companies he's involved in. The best I can find is [1], but that looks like a blog. Being director of a company we don't even have an article on doesn't confer notability either. The original version of the article looks identical to his Amazon biography at [2] so there may be copyright issues as well. Hut 8.5 15:59, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 01:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: As above, does not appear to meet WP:BIO. ialsoagree (talk) 21:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per User:Hut 8.5. Maashatra11 (talk) 13:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.