Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesco Sannino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Daniel (talk) 04:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Francesco Sannino[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current article reads like a resume and has been listed for notability since 2013. There do not appear to be sufficient independent sources to meet WP:BIO. An extensive list of Sannino's published works can be found here, but it is unclear if his research is influential enough to meet WP:PROF. Uffda608 (talk) 17:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Italy, Denmark, Science, and Academics and educators. Uffda608 (talk) 17:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I did find [1] and [2] (both in Italian) about a paper they wrote on the Higgs boson. His university profile [3] also says he's an associate editor for European Journal of Physics. His membership at both the Royal Danish and Finnish Academy of Science and Letters might satisfy WP:NPROF#1. Sgubaldo (talk) 10:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Danish sources about his work modelling the spread of COVID during the pandemic: [4], [5]. You should find more if you look up the titles of the listings here at his university's research profile. He also has a h-index of 67 which, while not exactly the best measure of notability/NPROF criteria, seems pretty high to me even if his work is related to particle physics. Leaning Keep for now.
Keep. EliteForsk Prize seems prestigious enough to satisfy NPROF#2. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 04:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep based on the Academy memberships mentioned above, seems NPROF#1 is met. Oaktree b (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.