Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frances Salisbury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Edwyn Burnaby (1798–1867) as possible search term and due to concerns with recreation. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frances Salisbury[edit]

non-notable. Queen Elizabeth has millions of ancestors, and notability is not inherited, so it shouldn't go the other direction either. This person is completely irrelevant to history except for some odd random chance ending up with a descendant two centuiries later becoming Queen. This AfD follows a declined PROD. Agricolae (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. —Agricolae (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, sounds like a totally average guy. Ancestors of prominent people are sometimes notable (for example, the clearly notable Leslie Lynch King, Sr.), but this guy doesn't have the requisite sources. Nyttend (talk) 02:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "guy"? I hope that you aren't commenting on the article without reading it. It clearly states that the subject is female. Uncle G (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the daughter, Anne Caroline Salisbury. JJL (talk) 00:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There is basically nothing here but genealogical data. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:06, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- NN. The suggested redirect is not objectionable in principle, but may encourage the creator to restore it to being a substantive article. Furthermore the target is also a NN person, whose article should be a redirect to her husband, Edwyn Burnaby (1798–1867), who is just about notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.