Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/France Awakens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

France Awakens

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable political party. Their sole candidate in the recent National Assembly elections, one of the two founding brothers, garnered 0.67% of the vote. The brothers have not gone without coverage (here, for example), but an article for the party is a case of WP:TOOSOON at best. --Finngall ^talk 22:57, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:27, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It had a moment Des jumeaux de 22 ans lancent un nouveau parti, Le Réveil de la France, Le Figaro, [1]. and this search [2].E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of in-depth coverage, because it fails WP:LASTING and a moment is seldom enough. Fails WP:GNG, fails especially WP:NORG --Bejnar (talk) 21:09, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 18:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG, ORG. South Nashua (talk) 18:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, not covered in depth and too soon to be included in Wikipedia - may not survive much longer as it is. 173.239.207.50 (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.