Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/François Fournier (Rugby union)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

François Fournier (Rugby union) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also nominating:

Karim Jammal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Does not meet WP:NRU criteria for notability of rugby players, nominating after PROD template was removed. No evidence of significant coverage outside organization profiles and match reports. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I dont agree with this request for deletion. Our players have accomplished a lot in order to be on our national team and it is unfortunate that because we are a small country our players do not have the best sources. Some of players have played and competed at high levels across the globe and take time and their own money to fly and compete for their country of heritage. --Lebanonrugbymedia (talk) 19:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think the mistake is to treat a Wikipedia page as a prize for hard work or something that one's entitled to, nor is it something for less famous people to get publicity. Wikipedia has clear and specific guidelines on what constitutes notability and I don't see how either player meets the guidelines. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.