Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Framroze Edulji Dinshaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Seth Edulji Dinshaw#Family. Any applicable material (i.e. not promotional) can be merged from history. ansh 666 03:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Framroze Edulji Dinshaw

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being landowner doesn't mean you are notable. Going in detail of everything from their ventures to philanthropy of their family, he is at least not notable as other two are. No significant coverage to pass WP:ANYBIO. Started by User talk:Waddington3. Störm (talk) 10:55, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Non-notable individual fails WP:ANYBIO to have an individual article. Suggested to merge with Seth_Edulji_Dinshaw Hagennos (talk) 19:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & redirect name only to Seth_Edulji_Dinshaw#Family where the subject is already discussed in sufficient detail. No need to preserve the article history as it's mostly promo 'cruft. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.