Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foxtaur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to taur. enochlau (talk) 15:28, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Foxtaur, Felitaur, Wolftaur

Non-notable: an apparent internet neologism with only 854 google hits, referenced only by other "taur" articles. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 01:40, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am setting the other "taur" articles' AFDs to this site to be considered en masse. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 01:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism (Wikipedia is not a dictionary). —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-04 02:10Z
Delete as per Quarl. Scoo 08:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Rudykog 09:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. There are no remarkable differences among the various "taur" besides what their names already suggest. - Ekevu (talk) 11:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as complete bollocks. Mythical creatures without the mythology - yeah, right. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 12:03, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Taurs are an established element of furry fandom, but countless variations on the theme don't need individual entries. Each entry should be redirected to the taur article as encountered. Gentaur 17:16, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Just add a list of the three as some of the slightly more common possibilities to Taur. GRuban 20:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Are these terms even notable enough for a redirect? - Rudykog 15:25, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO, if taur is notable, its non-notable variants should redirect to it. - Ekevu (talk) 17:25, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe better would be to redirect them to their WikiFur entries, where they'd be more notable and someone can add example pictures. Gentaur 18:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redirect or merge. Get rid of this fluff one way or another. Hu 05:01, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since the other two pages have been added to the list, get rid of all three bits of cruft. Hu 20:17, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect all three to Taur; readers can figure out how many legs each one has. ←Hob 09:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.