Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fowlmouth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Tiny Toon Adventures. MBisanz ^talk 13:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fowlmouth

This character does not establish notability independent of Tiny Toon Adventures through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the section in the main article is enough. TTN (talk) 22:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I think the content here is probably sourceable, but it does need some work. And he's just a supporting character. Might possibly be better to merge. There. I've !voted for something different each time, and actually read & considered the articles. And in this case, learned for the first time about the show--though I rather wish that hadn't been necessary :) DGG (talk) 04:38, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tiny Toon Adventures#Characters, minor character with evidently no real world notability. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To the closer This discussion should be included in the group nom at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babs and Buster Bunny. - jc37 15:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No it shouldn't. That nomination is bad enough as it is. Stifle (talk) 16:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How does this nom differ from that group nom? All of these noms are about Tiny Toons characters. And I would think that a group nom which discusses this would be something that the closer should at least take into consideration in attempting to determine consensus. The more voices, the clearer the view of the community, I would think. - jc37 16:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Tiny Toon Adventures. McWomble (talk) 05:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Please do not delete Fowlmouth. He is one of 22 important characters from Tiny Toon Adventures. All of the information is accurate and supports the plot and overall character of Fowlmouth. Artayes —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artayes (talk • contribs) 15:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.