Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Seasons Resort Jackson Hole
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Four Seasons Resort Jackson Hole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No establishemnet of notability, no RS, no reason for this to be in Wikipedia Jezhotwells (talk) 14:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Seasons Hotel Riyadh: What disturbs me is the navbox at the bottom of the page--looks like someone is trying to get some free advertising here. Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Reads like an advertisement, though not enough to invoke WP:CSD#G11. --Tckma (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I am not convinced that this article fails WP:N. Being badly written so that it reeks of advertising is not a reason to delete. However if the facts are correct that could well mean that the sources support notability. I'm surprised that we don't have more articles on these since many are truly notable. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Well the article makes no claims of notability and I can find none. Lots of passing references in leisure and travel sections of the press, but that doesn't establish notability. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:00, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete reads as an ad, not especially notable. Resolute 03:15, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.