Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Lanterns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Four Lanterns[edit]

Article on a small chain of local takeaways. While the article does provide sources it does not asert any notability and they appear trivial in nature, which is the primary criterion from WP:ORG. Wikipedia is not a PR wire to get a company's name out there possibly applies, -- in short, nothing that proves its notability. Vintagekits 20:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This nomination wasn't transcluded correctly onto the AFD log; it's fixed now. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 02:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. Doczilla 03:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable, does read slightly like an advertisement, and the contents are trivia-like....or should I just say "per nom". - Rjd0060 04:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep It is a wide spread, up & coming retaurant, with venues all over Ireland. Also it is much more than a local chipper.--Hiltonhampton 16:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, "up and coming" - its had the same number of outlets for years, "all over Ireland" - not really its a very localised chain, 3 in County Donegal and 1 in Sligo. But get me wrong, being from Sligo Town, I love and appricate the place, I've grew up with it, scoffed after Equinox in it, fought outside it etc etc etc - the only thing is that its not really notable is it!--Vintagekits 17:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete without prejudice. A7, unremarkable companies. When the reliable secondary sources are here, no objection to recreation. Martijn Hoekstra 16:32, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – clearly fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), as all three external links in that article are examples of "Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability". Andrwsc 18:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rockpocket 20:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.