Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foundry9
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 03:32, Jan. 29, 2006
Advertising/spam. Some of their clients are notable but is this company notable to have an article? According to the person's user name, the page was created by the co-founder of the company and his contributions are just putting his sites on the external links of other articles. J. Nguyen 23:15, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable corporation. 79 Google hits, 32 unomitted. An internet advertising company should have no problem advertising on websites outside of Wikipedia. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-24 01:06Z
- Delete per Quarl. Stifle 11:47, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have been an anymouse user of Wikipedia and find it very interesting so only recently have started contributing. Overall, there is very little information about the people that have helped to build the commercial internet. For example, there is no entry for internet advertising agency. These firms create the experiences that direct billions of advertising dollars and create sites used by hundreds of millions of users. As a category, its certainly a non-trivial professional group. Should I move this entry to my personal page and create a stub entry for Interactive Agency or Internet Agency to start capturing information about the class of companies ? --Matthewbernardini 02:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.