Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forward Public School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 11:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Forward Public School[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Additionally, the article has more serious problems which suggest to me it should be deleted regardless (without prejudice to recreation as a balanced, neutral, well-sourced article if WP:GNG is met); there is no content of any great merit worth salvaging.

The article started in 2012 with some quite serious accusations against living persons and 7 years later still wears a disputed tag.

Of the 2 references which were provided, one was dead, available on Archive.org, but removed by me as not a reliable source; the other is also a dead link which does not appear to be archived.

NPOV violation: A Google News search yielded few results, but the top results mention the school as one of several private schools with a student that achieved excellent exam results[1][2]. One does not get any impression of excellence from the article as it stands. kingboyk (talk) 15:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A search has yielded zero results with sourcing. The NPOV violations also strengthen my delete rationale. AmericanAir88^(talk) 16:37, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.