Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forum Italicum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 00:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Forum Italicum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a minor journal, created by an employee of the publishers, with no reliable independent sources. The "references" are merely index descriptors. Guy (Help!) 11:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I'm not sure if this fails WP:NJOURNALS, which explains that "[t]he most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the journal is included in the major citation indices". According to the journal's website, it is indexed by several major indexing services, including SCOPUS (which is specifically mentioned by WP:NJOURNALS as an example of a major citation index). I'm leaning toward keeping this, but I'm willing to be persuaded if someone can show me why this fails WP:NJournals. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Upon further consideration, I have concluded that this article passes WP:NJournals; I have updated my vote accordingly. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.