Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortis Battery Care

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fortis Battery Care[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately-sourced article about a company. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH for lack of reliable sources that cover the company in depth. - Mr X 11:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete possibly under A7. Some types of business get attention and coverage, and others don't. Same with people. Teach for 30 years as an Assistant Professor and you don't get an article. Play one game of professional football and you do. Peridon (talk) 20:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I would've explored PROD for deletion because this clearly has no signs of applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.