Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forscythe- de Steur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:37, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forscythe- de Steur[edit]

I'd expect a security consulting firm involved in the Balkans that was bought out for $17.4 million to have some ghits, it doesn't apart from wiki mirrors. Searching the the alleged founder while filtering for security turns up nothing useful. Not sure if it's a hoax but there's no evidence whatsoever it's notable even accounting for typos. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 17:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G3 Reads like a hoax to me. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Could find nothing to verify this using Google news/web, Forbes and Galenet and more. Dloh cierekim 20:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I fing nothing on the now parent company, Suisse Securite Internationale. Dloh cierekim 20:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Editor going for the subtle long game here, but a company named "Suisse Securite Internationale" in Michigan buying up a firm with ... I dunno, a sort of Belgian name? Right. Hoax. --Dhartung | Talk 20:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I thought the Suisse company bouth the Michigan one?? Dloh cierekim 20:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

with monopoly $$? In other words, I agree with Dhartung. I didn't want to call it an out-an-out hoax since it's been here almost a year but it smelled ducky to me TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 20:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good thing I was not drinking-- it would be coming out my nose. As you say, a long standing article that. . . quacks. Dloh cierekim 20:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 20:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.