Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Form
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Note that I deleted Form (philosophy). If you want to fork it off, that's fine, but you've got to fix all the incoming links to Form so that they go to the right place. howcheng {chat} 19:59, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Protracted dicdef. --Smack (talk) 05:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I see no reason to delete the topic as a whole, which deserves a substantive treatment in more than a dictionary format. That doesn't say that it can't be improved. Then again, what article can't? NB. What Links to Form
- PS. According to the Guide to Deletion, I do not think that Smack should have moved content to Form (philosophy) without prior discussion, and without preserving history and talk pages. Is this correct? It seems like a better way to proceed would have been to discuss the proposed reorganization first. Jon Awbrey 05:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep decent article, no reason to delete. Has more than a hundred articles linking to it -- Astrokey44|talk 10:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, as per Jon Awbrey and Astrokey44. Lukas 10:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-18 11:32Z
- Keep. WTF!? — goethean ॐ 18:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Really, if people wrote a wikilink to form and saw it as a redlink, they'd think "what the bloody fuck?" JIP | Talk 19:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Protracted dicdefs are exactly what encyclopedias are for. Cnwb 00:37, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Come on people! Form must have an article all to itself! --elzr 02:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.