Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forces Gateway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 06:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Forces Gateway[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NWEB. Non-notable UK Government site, tagged for notability for over 9 years. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Query. Is this an alternative name for what is now called Defence Gateway, explained here? --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly, there's no information that confirms this though. If it is, that other website doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NWEB either. Exemplo347 (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable in present presentation for a stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 12:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:V; no sources present in the article to confirm that the subject indeed exists. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.