Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foothills Alliance Church

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 04:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Foothills Alliance Church[edit]

Foothills Alliance Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable local church. Article was dePROD by creator Neelix previously, so per policy it goes to AfD. Legacypac (talk) 19:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 20:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 20:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Doesn't seem to be notable, article is an essentially unexpandable stub. -- WV 23:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- It looks like a typically NN local church to me. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Super lame fluff piece. A couple of the sources are actually display advertisements in the local newspaper. Fails GNG and should have been allowed to go away via its rightful assignment to PROD. Carrite (talk) 01:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This could've been speedily deleted as an A7, since it carries no meaningful claim of importance. Also, while the text could be fixed, as is, it does read mostly like a (harmless) plug. Gwen Gale (talk) 03:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Totally non-notable local church. Just more of Neelix's promo work. Softlavender (talk) 22:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.