Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Footboarding
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 00:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not too sure about this one.. checking with you guys Domthedude001 01:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have done quite a lot of research on this and the contents of this article are some of the facts I have found. Do some research and you will be surprised how common this topic is. Of course, you are welcome to edit the article as you see fit. AlienHook 01:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Alienhook, could you list your sources at the foot of the article please? --Malcolmxl5 01:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Question: User:Domthedude001, are you nominating because you beleive article is a hoax? Tiptoety 05:32, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I just don't think it is notable enough for an article-- if you added pictures and more references.. I would change my mind. -Domthedude001 18:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Unsure what the nom is, have done some research and have found sources: [1], and [2]. Suggest cite references in text.- Tiptoety 05:32, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't think the two sources provided by Tiptoety are referring to the same thing. I am also not sure if this is a notable concept, I cannot find any reliable sources in which footboarding is covered. --Kudret abiTalk 06:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CitiCat ♫ 00:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete no reliable sources suggesting notability. Pete.Hurd 03:04, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete only references I could find appear to be parody home-movies. No reliable sources indicating this is a notable concept - or even real. -- SiobhanHansa 13:56, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No notability established. –Henning Makholm 16:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as violating WP:N, WP:RS, and WP:V. Bearian'sBooties 19:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.